We have been studying how the brain remembers verbal information for nearly ten years. It allows the visual inputs to be recoded so that they can enter your short term verbal store, and it also refreshes decaying representations-without refreshing digits verbally, they would soon be forgotten. As you do this test, you may find yourself mentally rehearsing the string of digits as they appeared on screen this is the rehearsal system in action. The phonological loop comprises a verbal storage system and a rehearsal system. According to one influential cognitive theory, this system has specialised components, one of which, the "phonological loop," underlies verbal working memory abilities (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974). Scientists refer to short-term memory, or working memory, as the cognitive system that allows the temporary storage and manipulation of information. The science behind digit span reveals why it's associated more with verbal ability than short-term memory alone. The exact contribution of each test to each performance category may change as more data is collected. The results were published in Neuron in 2012 (Hampshire, Highfield, Parkin, & Owen, 2012). The contribution of each test to each performance category is based on a "factor analysis" that looked at how tests tend to clump together when measuring a massive set of data. That's right, perhaps surprisingly, it's more closely related to verbal ability than to memory. It's not easy, and requires a lot of practice to master. Experiment with your mental approach to the test to find strategies that work for you.įor most people, "chunking" is an effective strategy-instead of thinking about each digit separately, think of groups of digits that form a smaller number of meaningful units (chunks).įor example, instead of thinking about 1 4 2 8 5 7 as six digits, thinking of it as three numbers-14, 28, and 57-could make it easier to recall. These results support a model in which damage to the complex functional circuits subserving language leads to only minor deficits in process efficiency, because of the plasticity of developmental processes.Your digit span can be increased with the right strategies. Otherwise, there was little relation between site or size of lesion and the pattern of deficit. Within the group of children with cerebral infarct, the nature of the processing disability could be linked fairly well to site of lesion. The 12 children with left hemisphere lesions scored significantly lower than the 8 other children on the CELF-RS measure. Using the MPD procedure (Valdés-Pérez & Pericliev, 1997), we found that the controls and the five clinical groups could be best distinguished with two measures of online processing (word repetition and visual number naming) and one standardized test subcomponent (the CELF Oral Directions subtest). Furthermore, these children scored within the normal range on a measure of general cognitive ability, suggesting that there is no particular sparing of linguistic functions at the expense of general cognitive functions. This evidence for a moderate impairment of the basic skills underlying language processing contrasts with other evidence suggesting that these children acquire normal control of the functional use of language. Although most of the children with brain injury scored within the normal range on the majority of the tasks, they also had a disproportionately high number of outlier scores on the reaction time tests. Twenty children with early focal lesions were compared with 150 age-matched control subjects on 11 online measures of the basic skills underlying language processing, a digit span task, and 6 standardized measures.
0 kommentar(er)
